Clinical Performance of ‘no rub’ Multi-Purpose Solutions

Purpose:
Evaluate subjective comfort and satisfaction, corneal staining and lens deposits with the latest formulations of two MPS when used with FDA Group II and Group IV soft contact lenses according to their current ‘no rub’ indications.

Methods:
Multi-site, 231-subject double-masked bilateral crossover study to evaluate subjective comfort and satisfaction, corneal staining and lens deposits with two ‘no rub’ multi-purpose solutions (MPS) used with FDA Group II (alphafilcon A, SofLens* 66, Bausch & Lomb) and Group IV (etafilcon A, SUREVUE*, Johnson & Johnson Vision Care) soft contact lenses. Subjects used each of the two MPS, Regimen 1 (OPTI-FREE® EXPRESS® Multi-Purpose Disinfecting Solution No Rub™ Lasting Comfort Formula, Alcon Laboratories) and Regimen 2 (ReNu MultiPlus* Multi-Purpose Solution, Bausch & Lomb), for 28 days. They wore the same lens type for the duration of the study and were evaluated on days 0, 14 and 28 of each treatment period.

**Statistically significantly lower than ReNu* (ANOVA; Least Squares Means Comparisons; P < 0.0001)

Results:
Subjective ratings of comfort and satisfaction were significantly different between regimens, with the majority of variables in favour of Regimen 1 (P < 0.05). Corneal staining was significantly greater with the Group II, Regimen 2 combination (P < 0.0001). Group IV lenses cared for with Regimen 1 had significantly less residual lysozyme on Day 28 (562 ug) than lenses cared for with Regimen 2 (1145 ug; P < 0.0001). While both products offer the convenience of a ‘no rub’ regimen, differences in performance should be considered when recommending these solutions to patients.

Citation:

Stiegemeier MJ, Cedrone R, Evans D, et al. Clinical Performance of 'no rub' Multi-Purpose Solutions. Contact Lens Ant. Eye 2004;27:65-74.
* Trademarks are the properties of their respective owner.
Print
Close
Top